KeyCorp

(KEY)
$20.08
Financial Services Banks - Regional US Market Cap: 21.6B 17.9K employees

KeyCorp sells banking products and services (deposit accounts, lending, credit cards, mortgage and home equity loans) to individual consumers and small to medium-sized businesses via physical branches, ATMs, and digital platforms by providing convenient access to financial services and personalized relationship management. KeyCorp sells investment and wealth management, trust, and advisory services to mass affluent and high-net-worth individuals via dedicated wealth advisors and digital channels by offering tailored investment solutions and fiduciary expertise. KeyCorp sells commercial banking, capital markets, and treasury services (syndicated lending, debt and equity offerings, commercial real estate financing, derivatives, foreign exchange, public finance, payments) to middle-market and commercial clients via relationship bankers and specialized teams by delivering integrated financial solutions and industry expertise.

2d ago

LOCKED

Market: Normal

Key Catalysts & Risks

The most consequential swing factor is the proposed revised Basel III standardized approach: management estimates that, as currently drafted, it would deliver a material benefit to its marked CET1 ratio, which if finalised would free capital for buybacks and lift the return profile, though the rulemaking timeline and final calibration remain uncertain and largely outside the company's control. Management's explicit target of a mid-teens return on tangible common equity by end-2027, supported by fixed-rate asset repricing and a rising net interest margin into 2027, is the main fundamental catalyst, and each quarter of confirmation or slippage against that path is likely to move the multiple. The HoldCo activist campaign is a two-sided event catalyst: a proxy contest or board pressure could force faster capital return and sharper capital-allocation discipline, while a push for a sale is unlikely to succeed without a willing board and would inject strategic and leadership uncertainty. Integration of Clearwater UK into the institutional bank is a smaller but concrete growth catalyst, with management guiding to a modest revenue contribution in 2027 and lifting fee-income guidance on the back of it. The decision to stay out of bank M&A while peers consolidate cuts both ways, leaving Key exposed to relative scale and deposit-cost disadvantage while positioning it to win clients dislodged by other banks' deals.

Governance and control ambiguity around Scotiabank's large minority stake is the clearest structural issue: the stake and its board representation were described by the holder as passive, but the activist HoldCo characterises the arrangement as a stealth acquisition and wants an independent capital-allocation committee that excludes Scotiabank designees, meaning a large, strategically motivated shareholder now sits between the board and minority holders and could shape or block outcomes. Capital and interest-rate risk management has also been a recurring weak point, with prior securities and swap positioning contributing to balance-sheet stress, ratings pressure and dilution taken to repair capital, and press reports highlighted executive awards granted around the Scotiabank transaction as a question of how capital decisions are incentivised. If either pattern repeats, the practical consequence would be further dilution or slower capital return than the buyback narrative implies, which is the main channel through which the structural story could weigh on the medium-term equity case.

Research refreshed: 2nd of October 2026

Loading chart…
KEY
SMA 200
Volume
-
KEY:-
-
Volume:-
No time-series data available.

KPIs and Peer Benchmarks

ROE TTM
10.1%
ROIC TTM
3.9%
Operating Margin TTM
18.1%
P/B TTM
1.09
EV P/E Net Debt/EBIT Revenue Growth
Citizens Fi… (CFG) 30.8B 13.86 1.32 -9.7%
First Citiz… (FCNCA) 54.1B 11.01 9.71 -3.0%
First Horiz… (FHN) 14.2B 10.91 2.38 1.0%
Fifth Third… (FITB) 64B 17.19 5.98 -1.4%
Huntington … (HBAN) 49.5B 11.27 6.31 4.4%
M&T Bank Co… (MTB) 48B 11.56 3.94 -8.2%
The PNC Fin… (PNC) 145B 12.16 6.07 0.8%
Regions Fin… (RF) 20.8B 10.93 -0.81 2.5%
Truist Fina… (TFC) 123B 10.53 9.57 25.5%
Zions Banco… (ZION) 10.1B 7.96 0.64 -1.0%
KeyCorp (KEY) 34.6B 11.61 6.84 23.6%

AI Opinion

Fundamentals

BUY: The Q2 call materially strengthens the recovery case beyond funding-cost relief: C&I loans grew $2.1 billion sequentially, portfolio repricing supported NII, and payments and wealth fees grew. Approximately $2.0 billion of annual earnings provides a credible base, but slower quarterly revenue growth, weaker sequential efficiency and rising NPAs prevent STRONG BUY conviction. Headline 51.6% TTM revenue growth is base-effect inflated, not the sustainable growth assumption.

Peer Comparison

Peer fair value of $23.09 implies 15.2% price upside from $20.05, but KEY ranks ahead of only approximately 20% of peers on combined growth and quality. Historical fair value of $25.14 provides additional upside context, although its EV/sales methodology is less persuasive than banking-specific capital and profitability evidence. Use peer fair value as the principal valuation anchor rather than assume full historical-multiple restoration.

Macro Environment

Lower short-term rates could ease deposit costs but also compress asset yields; elevated long yields could restrain borrowing and pressure securities values. KEY's disclosed fixed-asset repricing provides a company-specific earnings catalyst rather than requiring a favorable macro forecast, although guidance assumes stable deposit competition and constructive markets. Employment resilience supports borrower capacity conditionally, while weak consumer demand and mixed financial-sector participation temper rerating confidence.

Key Metrics

NIM: 2.89%, guided to 3.0%-3.05% at FY2026 exit; NII growth guidance: 9%-11%; revenue growth guidance: 7%-8%; expense growth guidance: 3%-4%; CET1: 11.2%; marked CET1: 9.8%; NPAs: 74 bps; full-year NCO guidance: 40-45 bps. Reported ROIC of 3.93% and asset turnover of 0.05x indicate weak capital efficiency, although generic corporate ratios carry less weight for a bank. Trailing dividend yield is approximately 4.1%; historical low fair value of $19.98 offers essentially no valuation margin of safety.

Insider Activity

No trades in the latest 30 days. Six reported sales totaling approximately $5.16 million and no purchases create mildly bearish background sentiment, but older transactions, derivative inflows and no identified CEO/CFO selling make this a low-confidence, non-decisive signal.

Income Statement

Q2 NII increased approximately 9.6% year over year, with NIM reaching 2.89%; the call attributes improvement to commercial lending and portfolio repricing, supplementing the financial statements' funding-cost explanation. Management raised 2026 revenue growth guidance to 7%-8% and NII growth to 9%-11%, versus expense growth of 3%-4%, supporting prospective operating leverage. However, the expense ratio worsened sequentially to 62.22%, a $23 million reserve release supported earnings, and investment banking missed expectations. Conflicting earnings and investment-banking figures across reports reduce precision.

Cash Flow

TTM OCF of $1.311 billion converted approximately 65% of $2.030 billion net income; provider-defined FCF was $1.199 billion. Dividends and reported repurchases totaled $2.017 billion, exceeding both measures, while investment and financing movements were large and poorly reconciled. These figures temper confidence but do not independently establish payout stress for a bank; regulatory capital, funding stability and credit performance are more decisive.

Balance Sheet

Q2 call disclosures resolve important gaps in the earlier fundamental assessment: CET1 was 11.2%, marked CET1 9.8%, and deposit primacy 82%. Nevertheless, quarter-end deposits included a temporary $4 billion uplift, incremental lending required wholesale funding, and NPAs increased $126 million to 74 bps. The recovery depends on achieving more than 2% client-deposit growth without materially increasing funding costs; regulatory capital changes remain a constraint on distributions.